Let’s Talk About Your Case
Contact Info
Braddock Law Firm, PLLC
N/aCopyright © Braddock Law Firm, PLLC, 2024 | All rights reserved.
If you used the Paragard intrauterine device (IUD) and suffered injuries, you could bring a lawsuit seeking monetary damages. Hundreds of lawsuits allege that the device manufacturers sold and marketed a defective product.
Because so many women suffered injuries due to this defective product, courts are consolidating many lawsuits into multi-district litigation. Each injured woman retains their individual rights, but a judge will consider the cases together for efficiency.
Any woman who suffered injuries due to a Paragard device could collect reimbursement for their medical expenses, lost wages, as well as compensation for pain, suffering, diminished quality of life, and permanent impacts such as infertility. Do not lose your opportunity to claim damages from the manufacturer of the defective IUD. Contact a local Paragard lawyer at Braddock Law Firm, PLLC to learn how you can join the mass torts lawsuits.
The Paragard IUD has two arms extending at 90-degree angles from a central cylinder. The arms tend to break off when a physician attempts to remove the device. However, some women experienced breakage even though there was no attempt to remove it.
Once the device breaks, a physician must perform an invasive procedure to find and remove the broken pieces. Many women underwent hysteroscopy, in which the doctor uses an endoscope inserted through the cervix to locate and retrieve the broken piece. Some women endured more invasive procedures such as laparoscopy, laparotomy, or even hysterectomy.
In some cases, a physician could not locate the broken piece of the IUD. It may have become embedded in the uterine wall, which could lead to severe menstrual pain, pelvic inflammatory disease, infection, organ damage, and infertility. A diligent Paragard attorney can present evidence of the specific injuries a particular woman experienced to support their claim for damages.
The Paragard lawsuits assert that the product manufacturers, Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical, produced and marketed a defective product. The lawsuits allege that the product is defective because the:
The lawsuit also alleges the manufacturer was negligent for marketing a product that could cause women reasonably foreseeable injuries. The lawsuit suggests the manufacturer could have prevented the injuries to product users by conducting adequate stability testing, which would have revealed the arms’ tendency to break off.
When many people allege they suffered injuries from the same product, courts might consolidate cases to speed the cases through the system and ensure fairness to all litigants. Several individual cases might go to trial, and skilled Paragard attorneys would present their proof that Teva and CooperSurgical marketed a defective product and were negligent.
If the Paragard attorneys prove the manufacturers are liable, other individual plaintiffs need not present their proof. Instead, their attorneys need only prove the extent of each plaintiff’s damages. Handling complex litigation in this way reduces legal costs.
Because each plaintiff retains their individual rights in multi-district litigation, they are subject to the statute of limitations in their home state. In some states, a woman could be barred from bringing a lawsuit just one year after discovering that the Paragard device harmed them. Any woman who experienced arm breakage is wise to contact a Paragard attorney immediately.
If a Paragard device broke while inserted in your body or during removal, you could have a valid claim against the manufacturer. Hundreds of women across the country are joining the Paragard multi-district litigation lawsuits.
Help hold the manufacturer of this defective IUD accountable for the harm it caused. Contact a Paragard lawyer at Braddock Law Firm, PLLC to discuss joining the multi-district litigation today.